<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zócalo Public SquareSettle Up, Settle In, Settle For—Just Settle! &#8211; Zócalo Public Square</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2013/05/14/settle-up-settle-in-settle-for-just-settle/books/squaring-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org</link>
	<description>Ideas Journalism With a Head and a Heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 07:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Settle Up, Settle In, Settle For—Just Settle!</title>
		<link>https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2013/05/14/settle-up-settle-in-settle-for-just-settle/books/squaring-off/</link>
		<comments>https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2013/05/14/settle-up-settle-in-settle-for-just-settle/books/squaring-off/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 07:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zocalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Squaring Off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/?p=47818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In Squaring Off, Zócalo invites authors into the public square to answer five questions about the essence of their books. For this round, we pose questions to Australia National University political philosopher Robert E. Goodin, author of <i>On Settling.</i> Goodin takes a simple topic and, in little more than 100 pages, offers a case for settling (settling on, settling for, settling in, you name it) as a necessary complement to striving.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2013/05/14/settle-up-settle-in-settle-for-just-settle/books/squaring-off/">Settle Up, Settle In, Settle For—Just Settle!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org">Zócalo Public Square</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Squaring Off, Zócalo invites authors into the public square to answer five questions about the essence of their books. For this round, we pose questions to Australia National University political philosopher Robert E. Goodin, author of <i>On Settling.</i></p>
<p>Goodin takes a simple topic and, in little more than 100 pages, offers a case for settling (settling on, settling for, settling in, you name it) as a necessary complement to striving.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2013/05/14/settle-up-settle-in-settle-for-just-settle/books/squaring-off/">Settle Up, Settle In, Settle For—Just Settle!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org">Zócalo Public Square</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2013/05/14/settle-up-settle-in-settle-for-just-settle/books/squaring-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
