<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Zócalo Public SquareHave Emojis Replaced Emotions? &#8211; Zócalo Public Square</title>
	<atom:link href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2016/05/09/have-emojis-replaced-emotions/ideas/up-for-discussion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org</link>
	<description>Ideas Journalism With a Head and a Heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 07:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Have Emojis Replaced Emotions?</title>
		<link>https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2016/05/09/have-emojis-replaced-emotions/ideas/up-for-discussion/</link>
		<comments>https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2016/05/09/have-emojis-replaced-emotions/ideas/up-for-discussion/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 07:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zocalo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Up For Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/?p=72805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What could be more human than conversation, and what better time than now to converse? The desire to connect is a powerful force, technology a mighty conduit. Last month, when renowned astrophysicist Stephen Hawking joined Sina Weibo, China&#8217;s version of Twitter, he racked up more than 2 million followers in two days. His first post, which appeared in both English and Chinese, read: “In my physical travels, I have only been able to touch the surface of your fascinating history and culture. But now I can communicate with you through social media.” Yet, as the platforms for communication have multiplied, and with the means to connect now constantly available on our ubiquitous mobile devices, these “connections” can come with a cost: the loss of real-life human interaction. Why meet in person when you can converse on Facebook? Why answer a call when you can send a text? For every Hawking, there are countless hawkers. On social media, marketers of everything &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2016/05/09/have-emojis-replaced-emotions/ideas/up-for-discussion/">Have Emojis Replaced Emotions?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org">Zócalo Public Square</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What could be more human than conversation, and what better time than now to converse? The desire to connect is a powerful force, technology a mighty conduit. </p>
<p>Last month, when renowned astrophysicist Stephen Hawking <a href=http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-china-hawking-obsession-20160417-story.html>joined Sina Weibo</a>, China&#8217;s version of Twitter, he racked up more than 2 million followers in two days. His first post, which appeared in both English and Chinese, read: “In my physical travels, I have only been able to touch the surface of your fascinating history and culture. But now I can communicate with you through social media.”</p>
<p>Yet, as the platforms for communication have multiplied, and with the means to connect now constantly available on our ubiquitous mobile devices, these “connections” can come with a cost: the loss of real-life human interaction. Why meet in person when you can converse on Facebook? Why answer a call when you can send a text? For every Hawking, there are countless hawkers. On social media, marketers of everything from corn chips to cruises invite us to “<a href=https://hbr.org/2014/08/what-great-social-media-campaigns-get-right>join the conversation</a>.” But how much actual conversation is taking place? </p>
<p>As a preview for Zocalo’s sixth annual book prize event, “<a href=https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2016/05/12/can-we-close-the-empathy-gap/events/the-takeaway/>Why We Must Relearn the Art of Conversation</a>,” we asked communications scholars and linguists: How has the emergence of digital technology changed the way we communicate with one another? What are the advantages and disadvantages?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2016/05/09/have-emojis-replaced-emotions/ideas/up-for-discussion/">Have Emojis Replaced Emotions?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org">Zócalo Public Square</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://legacy.zocalopublicsquare.org/2016/05/09/have-emojis-replaced-emotions/ideas/up-for-discussion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
